All three models use people you can interview, work in your tools, and transfer IP to you. You pick dedicated seats, extra specialists in your squad, or a managed team we run.
We run discovery, technology audit, architecture review, AI or cloud readiness, security, performance, and cost reviews. You leave with a hire list and a sequence, not a slide that restates your backlog.
These are role mixes, not a menu of invented monthly rates. Price is Custom after discovery, once we see stack, seniority, and timezone overlap.
A starter squad for the first product slice.
Frontend, backend, DevOps, and QA on one backlog.
AI architect, engineers, and MLOps on the workflow you named.
You need one engineer, a cross-functional pod, or an offshore delivery center. We staff software, AI, cloud, DevOps, QA, and product roles that sit in your Slack and Jira.
These are operating rules, not slogans. If a line would fit any vendor, we did not use it.
Freelance hours get you a ticket queue. In-house hiring gets you a months-long req. A dedicated development team is the middle path: people you interview, on a monthly model, with delivery process attached.
Use a fixed-cost project when the outcome is an MVP, mobile app, copilot, RAG system, or a modernization cut. We still staff the same engineers. You buy the delivery, not a headcount line.
These are standing mixes, not a third pricing grid. Price stays Custom until we see stack and seniority. Enterprise, cloud, and QA mixes sit on the same card set so you can compare side by side.
You should feel this in the first sprint: people in your tools, code you own, and a way to add seats without a new vendor search.
These are named mixes you can start as a pod. Open a role page for one seat; leftover mixes sit in the industry cards below.
Domain context changes who we put on the pod. Use a card to jump into a vertical conversation or a live industry page.
Open a live hire page for the seat you need. Filter by service group or by role family.
Pick a vertical. You get three concrete squads we staff for that domain, including leftover team types from the catalog (enterprise software, DevOps, QA automation, digital transformation).
Data and integration team
Integration engineers on HL7/FHIR-style handoffs you already have.Clinical ops team
Engineers plus QA on patient-facing portals and EHR-adjacent flows.QA automation team
Automation testers plus security review on audit-friendly logging.Risk and fraud team
Engineers plus data seats on fraud-aware workflows.Enterprise software team
Backend and frontend on transaction and onboarding flows.Platform and security team
DevOps and security testers on SSO, logs, and release gates.Channels team
Mobile and web seats for multi-channel selling.Commerce product team
Full stack plus QA on catalog and checkout.DevOps team
DevOps and performance testers before the peak-season spike.Aftermarket commerce team
Product plus engineers on SKU and dealer flows.Ops data team
Data engineers on plant and partner feeds.Digital transformation team
Cloud and DevOps on the runtime those tools sit on.Data and integration team
Integration engineers on HL7/FHIR-style handoffs you already have.Clinical ops team
Engineers plus QA on patient-facing portals and EHR-adjacent flows.QA automation team
Automation testers plus security review on audit-friendly logging.Six steps from a written pod brief to people in your tools. You can stop after the pilot.
These are outcomes already on bigohtech.com. Open the study if you want the stack and the constraint, not a generic metric.
Hero Motocorp launched a website and PWA in 28 days with 800+ SKUs from 28 OEMs, then scaled to 8 cities. That is a dedicated build team, not a slide.
The same platform ecosystem our delivery teams already work in for product and dedicated-team engagements.
This is the floor written into the engagement, not an upsell. Team-type catalogs live in the section above.
NDA on request, ISO 27001-aligned delivery, and CMMI Level 3 appraised process on dedicated-team engagements.
Practical perspectives on hiring dedicated teams, product engineering, and delivery — shared by the people staffing production squads every day.
Dedicated seats, augmentation into a squad you already run, or a managed team where we own planning, QA, and support. Price is Custom after discovery; named roles, your tools, and IP transfer are in scope, while third-party licenses stay out unless added in writing.
Yes. You interview the engineers who will join your standup, not a sales engineer. Reject in writing and we send the next profile from the same search.
Yes. Bundles cover PM, design, engineering, QA, DevOps, and AI seats as a pod. You can also start with one role from the hire-by-service grid and add seats later.
Yes. Source code and work product assign to you in the contract before sprint one. NDA is available before we clone the repo.
After you approve profiles, you interview, then they work a bounded slice in your repo. We do not quote a same-week start because stack, seniority, and your interview loop set the calendar.
You set priorities. A named BigOhTech PM is on the SOW for staffing, escalations, and weekly stakeholder sync, and you still talk to engineers in Slack.
You name EST or PST as the overlap window in the pod brief. Async work continues after that window.
Yes. Add or reduce seats on the same MSA when the roadmap changes. You are not posting a new job for a two-sprint spike.
Yes. After launch we keep a maintenance and support plan on the product the team shipped. See IT Support and Maintenance for how that engagement runs.
You hire a dedicated development team here so you interview the people who join, keep a named PM on staffing, and run work in your Slack with EST/PST overlap. After launch, maintenance is a Support plan, not an informal leftover.
Share your project goals, timeline, and technical requirements. We'll review your requirements and send a tailored solution with an indicative estimate within 48 business hours.
